The administration also encouraged the development of alternative schemes of landowner compensation to motivate them to invest in rural-based industries that have strong linkages with agriculture. Experience has also proved that when the farmers and farm workers concerned are involved in decision-making about how their cases should be pursued, they are more likely to make a good impression in the lawcourts.
Certificates of Titles were useless. The necessary and appropriate interventions were made, from paralegal training to mediation using the mutual gains approach.
The implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program CARPintroduced by President Corazon Aquino inhas been slow, and the two case studies described in the article reveal the obstructions and complexities that are encountered in the administration of justice through agrarian reform. The State shall recognize the right of farmers, farm workers and landowners, as well as cooperatives and other independent farmers' organization, to participate in the planning, organization, and management of the program, and shall provide support to agriculture through appropriate technology and research, and adequate financial, production, marketing and other support services.
The primary objective of these projects was to help accelerate and effectively implement two landmark legislations, the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law and the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act. Absence of higher authority The Guingona case exemplifies a land conflict situation where outside groups from civil society have stepped in to assist the contending parties in resolving the case.
Land is a good of nature that needs to be used for the welfare of all. However, share tenancy continues to be prevalent, especially in rice and corn farms, in spite of past reform measures.
But the government response is usually unsatisfactory. Under the Aquino administration, a total oflandless tenants and farmers became recipients of land titles and support services.
These problems are the cause of the high levels of poverty, the enormous social inequality, the worst conditions of life for the rural population, the chronic and economically dependent underdevelopment, and the general lack of perspectives for workers in general. We defend the principle of the maximum size of the social ownership of the land per family in relation to the reality in each country.
The inability to deliver timely and adequate support services prevented many farmer beneficiaries from becoming economically viable producers and is threatening the sustainability of the claimed land distribution accomplishments.
The welfare of the landless farmers and farm workers will receive the highest consideration to promote social justice and to move the nation towards sound rural development and industrialization, and the establishment of owner cultivatorship of economic-sized farms as the basis of Philippine agriculture.
The SDO allowed corporate landowners the option to give farmers partial ownership of a company in the form of stocks shares in lieu of land distribution. The administration of Estrada was two short to observe if land reform program is successful.
Drawbacks The implementation of Agrarian reforms proceeded at a very slow pace. The arrival of the Spaniards set the formalization of a feudalistic management of these lands. SECTION 1. Title.
— This Act shall be known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of SECTION 2. Declaration of Principles and Policies.
— It is the policy of the State to pursue a Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP). Finally, there is the deed to look into the bureaucratic culture of those tasked to implement the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program.
The Department of Agrarian Reform, the Local Government Units, the Philippine National Police, and other agencies should be made more accountable of their actions in the implementation of the CARP. an act strengthening the comprehensive agrarian reform program (carp), extending the acquisition and distribution of all agricultural lands, instituting necessary reforms, amending for the purpose certain provisions of republic act no.otherwise, known as the comprehensive agrarian reform law ofas amended, and appropriating funds therefor.
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law: Philippines The Republic Act No.alternatively called the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law was signed by President Corazon C. Aquino on 10th June, The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law is responsible for the implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) in Philippines.
Its primary purpose was the proper implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), moving the agriculture program away from feudalism towards modern industrialization and at the same time rumoring social Justice. Executive Order No.July 22, – Provided mechanism for the implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP).
Proclamation No.July 22, – Instituted the CARP as a major program of the government.Implementation of the comprehensive agrarian reform